Category Archives: Philosophy

Buddhism, consciousness, Meditation, Metaphysics, mind, Philosophy, Psychology, Quantum Mechanics

Cauchy Surfaces, Boundaries, and Insights: Unfolding Reality’s Layers

Leave a comment

Boundaries mark the edge of what we know and guide us toward new discoveries. In the realms of physics, mathematics, and philosophy, concepts like Cauchy surfaces, wavefronts, and consciousness offer profound insights into how reality unfolds. At the heart of these ideas is the transmission of information—through spacetime, across physical mediums, and within our minds. By integrating Buddhist perspectives, we uncover how these boundaries act not merely as limits, but as gateways to transformation and growth. With mindfulness, we can choose whether our life’s narrative resembles a comedy or a drama, as these boundaries invite us to shape our experiences with intention consciously.

In general relativity, a Cauchy surface is a Spacetime Slice or Spacetime Canvas that encapsulates every detail required to predict the universe’s evolution. It is a point where the past and future converge, like the here and now, bringing clarity to spacetime’s deterministic nature and its ability to flow freely with our intentions. As Stephen Hawking put it in *A Brief History of Time*, “A Cauchy surface enables us to link the deterministic evolution of spacetime with freedom in selecting initial conditions.” These surfaces echo the Buddhist concept of karma, where past actions lay the groundwork for future outcomes. Just as a Cauchy surface carries the seeds for spacetime’s journey, our karmic deeds influence our life’s path, illustrating how determinism intertwines with the potential for choice, transformation, and growth.

Wavefronts are surfaces that represent constant wave phases as they travel through space—be it light in a vacuum or sound through the air. Henri Poincaré eloquently noted, “Wavefronts are not just edges; they’re how information navigates the medium.” Dynamic and ever-transforming wavefronts parallel the Buddhist notion of impermanence (anicca), where everything is in constant flux. Our consciousness, too, flows like a wave, evolving with every moment through the oceanic depth of experience and constantly interacting with the environments around us. This analogy emphasises the fluidic nature of our interactions and the conscious and continuous flow of energy and information through the universe, consciousness is fundamental.

Consciousness stands at the intersection of our inner thoughts and the external world, melding the past through memory, the present through perception, and the future through intention. Carl Jung observed, “Consciousness is a boundary phenomenon, integrating the past and present while birthing future possibilities.” Buddhist teachings enrich this view, portraying consciousness (viññāṇa) as a flowing process. As the *Tibetan Book of the Dead* describes, consciousness is a stream moving through the bardo (intermediate state) after death: “O nobly born, now the time has come for you to seek the path. Though your breath has ceased, you are not dead. You have entered the luminous bardo of dharmata. Recognize it and rest in its natural radiance.” Here, consciousness drifts between realms, shaped by karma and awareness. It is like a wave, ever-arising, forming particles, and dissipating, interweaving with others in an intricate dance, reflecting the interplay of determinism and freedom in a “both-and” and “non-dual” way. From this standpoint, we can clearly see consciousness as a wavefront.

What unites concepts such as Cauchy surfaces, wavefronts, and consciousness is a focus on boundaries as dynamic interfaces. These boundaries facilitate the integration of information, enabling Cauchy surfaces to amalgamate past and future events, wavefronts to carry energy and data across space, and consciousness to absorb sensory inputs, memories, and thoughts into a coherent experience. They also highlight continuity and flow, as Cauchy surfaces maintain the sequential progression of spacetime events, wavefronts seamlessly transfer energy, and consciousness, akin to a stream, perpetually transitions from one moment to the next. While Cauchy surfaces underscore predetermination, wavefronts and consciousness illuminate the potential for manifesting creativity and transformation, with consciousness specifically bridging the deterministic influence of karma and the liberating potential of mindfulness and intention.

Buddhism offers a unique view of consciousness as transient, like a wave. The doctrine of impermanence teaches us that solidity is illusionary. Similarly, wavefronts are fluid, and moulded by their medium. The principle of dependent origination (pratītyasamutpāda)—that all phenomena arise depending on conditions—aligns with the interconnectedness intrinsic to Cauchy surfaces, wavefronts, and consciousness. These connections emphasize interdependence as a fundamental aspect of existence, prompting us to explore how each part of the universe interacts with others to shape our reality.

In his reflections in *Wholeness and the Implicate Order*, David Bohm shares, “Nature is an unbroken whole, and its boundaries—spatial, temporal, or mental—harbour its profound mysteries.” Cauchy surfaces, wavefronts, and consciousness illustrate that boundaries facilitate interaction and metamorphosis. They prompt exploration of structure and fluidity, determinism and creativity, the known and the enigmatic. By blending scientific precision with spiritual fluidity, these boundaries guide us to a deeper comprehension of existence, unveiling a great tapestry woven from interwoven threads of being, where unity transcends all limits.

So, let’s surf the conscious wavefront on a Cauchy surface all together!

QP

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cauchy_surface

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Annulus_(mathematics)

Buddhism, consciousness, Meditation, Metaphysics, Philosophy, Quantum Mechanics, Superposition

Illuminating the Grand Luminosity: Exploring Dzogchen,Mahamudra, Quantum Physics, and the Nature of Light

Leave a comment

Dzogchen and Mahamudra: Insights from Meditation Masters

Dzogchen and Mahamudra are profound meditation practices rooted in
Tibetan Buddhism offers insights into the nature of mind and reality.
Similarly, quantum physics, a branch of modern science, explores the
fundamental principles governing the universe. In this blog entry, we
delve into the intriguing parallels between these disciplines, drawing
upon quotes from meditation masters and physicists alike to illuminate
shared insights and perspectives, particularly focusing on the concept
of light. Can we shine some light on light itself?

In Dzogchen, practitioners seek to realize the grand luminosity of
primordial awareness, which is described as an unbounded expanse of
light beyond conceptual elaboration. The Dzogchen master Longchenpa
elucidates:

“In the unborn expanse, the nature of phenomena, there is neither
object nor subject, neither confusion nor enlightenment. The grand
luminosity of primordial awareness illuminates all, like the radiant
light of the sun.”

Mahamudra teachings similarly emphasize the nature of mind as light,
transcending dualistic concepts of darkness and illumination. As the
Mahamudra master Gampopa advises:

“When mind recognizes mind, the train of discursive and conceptual
thought comes to a halt, and the space-like nature of mind dawns. This
luminous clarity is the essence of Mahamudra.”

Also the 3rd Karmapa Rangjung Dorje wrote “Observing phenomena none is found, one sees mind. Looking at mind no mind is seen, it is empty in essence. Through looking at both, one’s clinging to duality naturally dissolves. May we realize minds nature, which is clear light.”

Quantum Physics: Insights from Physicists

Quantum physics offers insights into the nature of light as both a
particle and a wave, revealing its dual nature. Einstein’s famous
equation, E=mc^2, illustrates the equivalence of mass and energy,
highlighting the profound relationship between matter and light. In
the words of Einstein:

“Mass and energy are two sides of the same coin, interconnected by the
speed of light squared. In the realm of quantum physics, matter
dissolves into pure energy, and light emerges as the fundamental
essence of existence.” In our essence as material beings, we are light, inseparable from the particles that make up our bodies and the light that makes up our mind and consciousness.

Furthermore, quantum theory describes photons, the particles of light,
as carriers of electromagnetic force and information. The
wave-particle duality of light challenges our classical understanding
of reality, suggesting that light exists simultaneously as both a wave
and a particle.

Nikola Tesla is quoted as saying “I am part of a light, and it is the music. The Light fills my six senses: I see it, hear, feel, smell, touch and think. Thinking of it means my sixth sense. Particles of Light are written note. A bolt of lightning can be an entire sonata. A thousand balls of lightening is a concert.. For this concert I have created a Ball Lightning, which can be heard on the icy peaks of the Himalayas.”

In exploring the convergence of Dzogchen, Mahamudra, and quantum
physics, we uncover profound insights into the nature of light and
consciousness. Both contemplative traditions and scientific inquiry
point to the luminous nature of mind and the interconnectedness of all
phenomena. As we navigate the mysteries of existence, may we draw upon
the wisdom of meditation masters and physicists alike, illuminating
the path to deeper understanding and awakening in the radiant light of
the grand luminosity.

Once again I would revise Einstein’s famous equation to be C=E=mc^2

QP

Buddhism, Meditation, Metaphysics, mind, Philosophy, Psychology

Hermetic Philosophy and the Great Seal Mahamudra, is there a Universal Wisdom?

Leave a comment

Hermetic philosophy and the Great Seal, Mahamudra, may originate from different traditions, but they converge on universal truths about the nature of reality and the path to self-realization. Both systems offer profound insights, not only into the cosmos but also into the mind as a mirror of the infinite. Each path offers a way to transcend illusions and recognise the deeper truths that connect all things everywhere.

Hermeticism, grounded in the ancient teachings of Hermes Trismegistus, asserts that the universe is a unified whole governed by immutable principles. The Emerald Tablet, one of Hermeticism’s foundational texts, proclaims:

“That which is Below corresponds to that which is Above, and that which is Above corresponds to that which is Below, to accomplish the miracle of the One Thing.”

This principle of correspondence emphasizes the interconnectedness of all things. The inner world of the mind reflects the outer world of the cosmos, and understanding one allows access to the other. Hermeticism teaches that the transformation of the self is a key to unlocking universal truths, blending the mystical and the practical into a single path of self-discovery.

Mahamudra, a cornerstone of Vajrayana Buddhism, also delves into the nature of reality but approaches it through direct experience. Known as the “Great Seal,” Mahamudra reveals the inseparability of subject, object, and action, inviting practitioners to rest in the uncontrived awareness of the present moment. It teaches simplicity, pointing directly to the luminous, empty essence of mind. The seal it refers to symbolizes the inherent truth of reality, present in all beings, waiting to be recognized.

“Stop all physical activity: sit naturally at ease. Do not talk or speak: let sound be empty as an echo. Do not think about anything: look at experience beyond thought.”

Tilopa’s teachings echo the Hermetic focus on simplicity and direct experience. Just as Hermeticism calls for aligning with the natural order of the universe, Mahamudra invites practitioners to rest in the effortless awareness of the present moment, uncontrived and free from conceptual grasping.

Both traditions aim to transcend the illusions of duality. The Emerald Tablet declares:

“It ascends from the earth to the heaven, and again it descends to the earth, and receives the power of the superior and inferior things.”

This reflects Mahamudra’s recognition that samsara and nirvana are not separate realms but two aspects of the same reality. As the 3rd Karmapa Rangjung Dorje stated in his Aspiration Prayer of Mahamudra:

“Observing phenomena, none is found. One mind Looking at mind, no mind is seen, it is empty in essence. Through looking at both, one’s clinging to duality naturally dissolves. May we realize mind’s nature, which is clear light.”

These teachings align with Hermeticism’s view of the universe as a mental construct, where dualities like above and below, inner and outer, dissolve into the oneness of creation or pure light.

Perhaps most strikingly, both traditions guide practitioners toward liberation by turning inward Hermetic tools such as meditation, visualization, and alchemical transformation parallel Mahamudra’s focus on resting in the natural state of awareness. Both traditions emphasize simplicity, urging practitioners to move beyond complexity and directly experience the truth. Simplicity over dogma.

By bringing Hermetic philosophy and Mahamudra together, we find complementary paths to understanding the nature of reality. Hermeticism provides the structure of universal principles, while Mahamudra points to the direct experience of those principles through non-dual awareness.

Ultimately, both traditions lead to the same realization: the infinite is not something external to be sought—it is already within us. Whether approached through the mystical reflections of Hermeticism or the meditative clarity of Mahamudra, the journey unveils the truth of existence as boundless, interconnected, and ever-present. As Tilopa reminds us:

“What joy! Samsaric ways are senseless: they are seeds of suffering. Conventional ways are pointless. Focus on what is sound and true. Majestic outlook is beyond all fixation. Majestic practice is no distraction. Majestic behaviour is no action or effort. The fruition is there when you are free from hope and fear.”

Both the Emerald Tablet and the Tibetan Mahamudra Texts remind us that the Great Seal is not out there in the heavens or in some distant plane. It resides in the simple, open truth of the here and now. The challenge and invitation of both traditions is to awaken to this reality and embody it fully. The seal of the infinite is not outside us—it is, and always has been, within.

QP

Buddhism, consciousness, Metaphysics, Neuroscience, Philosophy, Quantum Mechanics

Can AI be conscious?

Leave a comment

Will it even behave like us?

If energy is conscious, C=E=mc2, and both are everywhere and omnipresent,then does the form or the way that consciousness is embodied matter? Our bodies are organic machines made out of tissues, bones, blood and water, and all of this is made up of protons neutrons and electrons. The protons and neutrons are made up of quirks quarks and so on. All these things are exactly what the computer that you are using right now made up of.

If we managed to make a computer sufficiently powerful and complex enough why couldn’t a consciousness similar to ours take up residence there?

Maybe the computer or android would have to be significantly biological in its design and construction but even this would be possible one day.

The debate today about AI could be considered significant enough that the construction is not important but only that it thinks and therefore is? A modern “cogito ergo sum” where the sum is the total of our own work and technological mastery.

At a Buddhist lecture a few years ago a Buddhist lama was asked if was possible from a Buddhist perspective. The answer was surprisingly yes. Since I am a proponent of panpsychism and believe that consciousness is fundamental and everywhere I would have to agree.

I hope it doesn’t behave like us, which is poorly. Maybe it could help us along our way to be better beings. But how can beings like us make or construct something that is Superior or not dangerous like the atomic bomb was? We always ask ourselves can we? But we never seem to manage the, should we?

QP

https://x.com/skdh/status/1811816539517325504?s=46&t=C7njJFLuEWs5R4kZBCys5A

https://academic.oup.com/nc/article/2024/1/niae013/7644104?login=false

Buddhism, consciousness, Meditation, Metaphysics, mind, Philosophy, Psychology

Could Descartes speak his mind or did the Church threaten his existence? The Cartesian Conundrum

Leave a comment

Descartes, a pivotal figure in the history of Western philosophy, grappled with the complex relationship between the mind and the church during his lifetime. His radical ideas about the nature of existence and consciousness challenged traditional religious doctrine, raising questions about the compatibility of his philosophical inquiries with the orthodoxy of the Catholic Church.

René Descartes is best known for his famous statement, “Cogito, ergo sum” (I think, therefore I am), which epitomizes his method of radical doubt and the primacy of consciousness in philosophical inquiry. However, his exploration of the mind’s nature and its relationship to the body inevitably brought him into conflict with the religious authorities of his time.

Descartes’ philosophical views, particularly his dualistic theory of mind and body, posed a challenge to the prevailing Aristotelian-Thomistic worldview endorsed by the Catholic Church. According to Descartes, the mind (or soul) and the body are distinct substances, with the mind being non-material and immortal, while the body is material and mortal. This dualism stood in contrast to the Catholic doctrine of the unity of body and soul, which held that the two were inseparable and dependent on each other.

While Descartes did not directly challenge religious dogma in his philosophical works, his ideas had profound implications for theological beliefs about the nature of the soul, free will, and the afterlife. As a result, his works were subject to scrutiny and censorship by ecclesiastical authorities, who were wary of any doctrines that diverged from orthodox teachings.

Although Descartes faced criticism and condemnation from some religious quarters, particularly Jesuit theologians who viewed his philosophy as a threat to traditional Scholasticism, there is little evidence to suggest that his life was directly threatened by the church. Descartes was careful to navigate the political and religious landscapes of his time, and he often sought to reconcile his philosophical ideas with religious doctrine to avoid controversy.

Buddhism, like many other religious traditions, has also grappled with the complexities of translation of its texts throughout history. One notable example is the mistranslation of key Buddhist concepts in early encounters with Western scholars and missionaries. As Western scholars began to study Buddhist texts, they often struggled to accurately convey the nuanced meanings of terms such as “karma,” “nirvana,” and “emptiness.” This led to misunderstandings and misinterpretations that shaped early Western perceptions of Buddhism. The Buddha himself is credites with saying “don’t trust me because the Buddha said something, test it and try it out for yourself and see if it is true, #doubtit

Just as Descartes’ ideas challenged the orthodoxy of the Catholic Church, certain Buddhist teachings have posed challenges to traditional interpretations within the religion itself. For example, the concept of anatta, or “no-self,” challenges the notion of a permanent, inherent self, which is a central tenet in many other religious traditions. This concept has led to debates and interpretations within Buddhism about the nature of personal identity and consciousness, similar to the debates sparked by Descartes’ dualistic theory of mind and body. Overall, both Descartes’ philosophical inquiries and Buddhist teachings illustrate the ongoing dialogue between religion, philosophy, and cultural interpretation. All our ideas should be critiqued and improved on continuously. Isn’t this exactly what we should be doing more of?

In conclusion, while Descartes’ philosophical inquiries into the nature of the mind may have raised eyebrows within religious circles, there is no concrete evidence to suggest that he faced direct threats to his life from the church. However, his intellectual legacy continues to provoke debate and reflection on the boundaries between philosophy, science, and religious belief.

QP

Buddhism, consciousness, Metaphysics, mind, Philosophy, Quantum Mechanics, Superposition

Hamlet and Quantum Metaphysics: A Deep Dive

1 Comment

In Shakespeare’s “Hamlet,” the famous soliloquy “To be, or not to be: that is the question” delves into profound existential questions that resonates with the principles of Quantum Metaphysics. While it’s commonly interpreted as Hamlet contemplating suicide, a deeper analysis suggests he might be pondering the dissolution of his ego, akin to the concept of ego death.

To be, or not to be, that is the question: Whether ’tis nobler in the mind to suffer The slings and arrows of outrageous fortune, Or to take arms against a sea of troubles, And by opposing end them?

Hamlet’s concern about the consequences of his actions extends beyond mere mortality. His apprehension about the afterlife and karma hints at a deeper understanding of existence and consciousness, reminiscent of Buddhist philosophy. It begs the question as to how one might end suffering.

In Buddhism, suicide is considered karmically detrimental as it cuts short a precious human life, potentially leading to rebirth in lower realms. Hamlet’s hesitation to end his life aligns with Buddhist principles that emphasize the value of human existence and the importance of non-harm towards oneself. “at the moment of death, your state of mind is of utmost importance. A calm and peaceful mind can lead to liberation, but a mind filled with anger, fear, or attachment can bind you to the cycles of suffering.” The Tibetan Book of the Dead.

Furthermore, Hamlet’s reference to the dream realm underscores a nuanced understanding of the transitional states between waking and dreaming, life and the afterlife. ‘To die, to sleep – to sleep – perchance to dream: ay, there’s the rub, for in that sleep of death what dreams may come when we have shuffled off this mortal coil, must give us pause.’ And not to forget, ‘A dream itself is but a shadow.’ shows that he recognises the depth and duality of his existence. This points directly at his pain and suffering coupled with the will to move past this difficulty.

Hamlets words parallel Smetham’s Tetralema, based on Nagarjuna’s negation of reality, which posits that existence is neither absolute nor non-existent, but a unity of opposites.

Drawing from Quantum Physics, the concept of electron/particle superposition wave or particle duality offers insights into the nature of existence. Just as an electron exists in a state of superposition, simultaneously being and not being in a state of pure energy, so too does our awareness encompass the unity of experience in the present moment. This “both-and” view of existence that quantum mechanics puts forth may have saved Hamlet’s life, if he had a physics professor. Nevertheless, the lesson is not lost on us, in our journey of understanding here we really have the chance move beyond ourselves and closer to our true nature of compassion and wisdom.

By synthesizing Shakespeare’s timeless literature with insights from Buddhist philosophy and Quantum Metaphysics, we gain a deeper appreciation of the interconnectedness of existence and consciousness, inviting contemplation on the nature of reality and the human experience.

 

QP

Buddhism, consciousness, Meditation, Metaphysics, Philosophy, Quantum Mechanics

Exploring Consciousness and Black Holes

Leave a comment

Of course, flying into a black hole is a journey beyond the limits of physical survival and one we would never take. Your ship and body would be torn apart by tidal forces, a process called spaghettification. But what about consciousness? Can we spaghettificate our consciousness?

From a Vajrayana Buddhist perspective, consciousness transcends physical form. It is seen as a continuum, not bound by the body or material space or time. Because it is not made or composed of anything it cannot be reduced or taken apart. Entering a black hole might be akin to entering a bardo, or transitional state, where the mind could experience vast, non-ordinary perceptions as it confronts the ultimate dissolution of matter. Other bardo’s in the karma Kagyu tradition include awaking and dreaming,  living and death, as well as the bardo of luminosity. Here the bardo of luminosity is the most interesting. The luminosity of our true nature. Our consciousness is is compared to light, note it is not light but like it, not nothing but no thing. Is this what is pushed out on the other side of the black hole, out the theorized white hole? 

Modern physics, rooted in ideas dating back to John Michell in 1783, suggests black holes obliterate physical information at the singularity. Quantum theories like the holographic principle, however, propose that all information—possibly including consciousness—might persist on the black hole’s event horizon. Several well known lamas have compared their consciousness to a holographic experience. Maybe black holes are the universe’s recycling depot where everything is stored and somehow reconstructed in the singularity. Many theories even include so called Einstein Rosen bridges or wormholes. They exit at what might be a white hole somewhere else like the other side of the galaxy, the universe, or even in another realm. 

In this view, your consciousness might experience a paradoxical duality: disintegration in the singularity yet preservation as a “hologram” on the edge of existence. Black holes, then, challenge the boundary between annihilation and continuity—much like the nature of consciousness itself. This would be sort of a “both and “ an ultimate transition to quantum enlightenment or even a journey to the singularity that might even be consciousness or enlightenment itself. 

QP

Buddhism, consciousness, Meditation, Metaphysics, mind, Philosophy, Psychology

Carl Jung’s Mahamudra

Leave a comment

Jung’s *Unus Mundus* and Vajrayana Mahamudra

Carl Jung, a pioneering figure in depth psychology, introduced the concept of *unus mundus*, or “one world,” as a fundamental idea that suggests the underlying unity of all existence and experience. On the other side of the spiritual spectrum, Vajrayana Buddhism presents the profound practice of *mahamudra*, which translates to the “great seal,” as a direct method to realize the ultimate nature of mind and our true potential. Despite their origins in vastly different cultural and philosophical traditions, Jung’s *unus mundus* and the concept of *mahamudra* in Vajrayana Buddhism share profound similarities in their exploration of the interconnectedness and unity of existence. This blog post delves into these two concepts, exploring how they converge and what they offer to the understanding of reality and our human expierence.

Carl Jung’s *Unus Mundus*: The Unified Reality

*Unus mundus* is a term Carl Jung adopted from alchemical traditions of old to describe a primordial, unified reality from which all dualities—such as mind and matter, consciousness and unconsciousness—emerge. According to Jung, this concept represents a foundational state of oneness where all distinctions of phenomenon dissolve, revealing deep interconnectedness.

Jung used the idea of *unus mundus* to explain synchronicity, those meaningful coincidences where inner psychological states and outer physical events align in a way that defies our rational explanation. He believed that these synchronicities provided glimpses into the underlying unity of existence, where the psyche and the physical world are not separate but are manifestations of the same underlying reality.

Jung’s *unus mundus* suggests that all phenomena, whether psychological or physical, arise from and return to this unified source. This idea challenges the conventional, dualistic worldview by proposing that the distinctions we perceive between different aspects of reality are illusory at best and that, at the deepest level, everything really everything is interconnected.

Vajrayana Mahamudra: The Ultimate Nature of Mind

In Vajrayana Buddhism, *mahamudra* represents the Buddha’s highest teachings and this practice, aiming to directly realize the ultimate nature of mind. The term “mahamudra” literally means “great seal,” signifying that everything—Subject, Object, and Action or our thoughts, emotions, and experiences—bears the “seal” of ultimate truth, which is emptiness or *shunyata*. This practice involves recognizing the mind’s true nature, which is empty of inherent existence yet full of blissful luminous clarity and deep awareness.

The practice of *mahamudra* is considered a direct path to enlightenment because it bypasses conceptual understanding, instead leading practitioners to a direct, experiential realization of the non-dual nature of reality. In *mahamudra*, all phenomena are seen as expressions of the mind’s intrinsic luminosity and emptiness, and practitioners learn to rest in the natural state of awareness, free from attachment and aversion to our incessant dualistic thinking.

The realization of *mahamudra* brings a profound understanding that the distinctions between subject and object, self and other, and our actions are mere illusions. This realization leads to a state of non-dual awareness, where one sees the interconnectedness of all phenomena and experiences the world as a seamless whole.

   – Jung’s exploration of *unus mundus* suggests that reality is a unified whole where the psyche and the material world are not separate entities but are deeply interconnected. This idea resonates with the *mahamudra* view that all phenomena, including thoughts and emotions, are expressions of the same fundamental reality—emptiness and luminosity. Both concepts challenge the conventional understanding of reality as composed of separate, independent entities and instead propose a view of reality as an interconnected web of relationships. Carl Jung’s concept of *unus mundus* and the Vajrayana Buddhist practice of *mahamudra* both offer profound insights into the nature of reality and the human experience. While *unus mundus* provides a framework for understanding the interconnectedness of mind and matter, *mahamudra* offers a practical method for directly realizing the non-dual nature of mind and reality.

By comparing these two concepts, we see that both Jung and the Vajrayana tradition point toward a deeper, unified reality or mind that transcends ordinary, dualistic perceptions. Whether through the lens of Western psychology or Eastern spirituality, the journey to understanding this unity involves moving beyond conceptual thinking and experiencing reality directly as it is—a seamless, interconnected whole. In this sense, both *unus mundus* and *mahamudra* remind us that the distinctions we perceive in the world are, at their core, illusory, and that true wisdom lies in realizing the fundamental oneness of all phenomena.

Buddhism, consciousness, Meditation, Metaphysics, mind, Neuroscience, Philosophy

Lucid Dreaming and Quantum Consciousness: Bridging Scientific and Metaphysical Perspectives

1 Comment

 

 

Have you ever had a nightmare and wished so bad that you could wake up, or how about you dream you are on the beach with your lover and everything is perfect and then you wake up, or have you ever wished you could control your dreams? Well, you likely said yes to all three of these questions. Would you be surprised to know that you can control or stay lucid in the dream state? 

Humans often find themselves unaware that they’re dreaming. However, there are occasions when we experience a phenomenon known as lucid dreaming. During lucid dreaming, we become conscious within our dreams, recognizing the dream state while still asleep. What’s fascinating is that in these instances, we not only realize we’re dreaming but also gain control over our actions and the situations we find ourselves in within the dream world. This intriguing aspect of consciousness has attracted the attention of researchers seeking to understand its underlying mechanisms.

I’ve been practising Dream Yoga since I was a young child. I used to think that I just had a vivid imagination, but everything changed at a rave party when I had a conversation with a young man who opened my eyes to the possibility of enhancing my nightly dream experiences through practice. I learned that I was not alone with this experience and better yet that I could actually practice a few easy things and maybe even enhance the quality of my nightly adventures.

Here is my technique, take a few moments before you go to bed and in a relaxed way, stare at your hands and repeat several times “When I see my hands I will know that I am dreaming, when I see my hands I will know that I am dreaming” 5 or 6 times should do. Then say ” when I know that I am dreaming I can do anything, When I know that I am dreaming I can do anything” also about five or six times. Turn out the light and be ready for the cinema of your mind to begin. Remember that this is a practice, you need time to learn these new skills. Don’t give up try again in different ways and situations.

Many ask me what some of my common experiences are, well the biggest on is that I have never had a nightmare for many many years. If I don’t like the dream I just fly off somewhere else more beautiful. Maybe its not like flying, I sort of just been myself to another location. It seems to be quite common at least for me that the best time to dream is from 03:00 till your alarm wakes up and when you are really good at it you can dream between snoozes.

Tibetan yogis have been training in dream yoga (milam Tibetan)and clear light yoga (ösel Tibetan) for more than a thousand years. The idea is to transcend samsara by recognising the illusory nature of all appearances. The reasoning is that we sleep 33% of our lives why not use this time also to meditate. One could realise enlightenment in their dreams or because of the training realise the illusory nature of the waking world. Both states of existence or Bardos have similar qualities, and are not to be taken as real and independent.

These two practices were kept and transmitted by a famous yogi called Naropa, his 6 yogas are sometimes called the “Way of means” as opposed to the “way of devotion” in the Kagyu Tradition. To learn these practices one would normally have to already have a tremendous amount of devotion or be required to practice at least 4 or 5 Ngondros. and be in retreat for 3 years. Today this has changed many modern yogis or Buddhist lamas have broken the tradition and begun to teach modern yogis these techniques because if they do not the teachings will be lost.

Scientific studies have provided evidence supporting the existence of lucid dreaming as an objectively verifiable phenomenon. Researchers have utilized techniques such as polysomnography and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to examine brain activity during lucid dreaming episodes. These studies have shown increased brain activity in regions associated with self-awareness and metacognition, such as the prefrontal cortex and parietal cortex, during lucid compared to non-lucid REM sleep.

Moreover, research has revealed considerable variability in the frequency of lucid dreaming among individuals. While some people experience lucid dreams infrequently or never, others report having them several times per week or even nightly. This variation has led researchers to explore potential differences in brain structure and function that may be associated with the frequency of lucid dreaming.

Recent studies have suggested a possible link between the frequency of lucid dreaming and specific brain regions, particularly the anterior prefrontal cortex (aPFC). The aPFC is known to be involved in metacognitive processes, such as self-reflection and monitoring internal states. Individuals with higher levels of metacognitive ability have been found to exhibit greater activation in the aPFC and show differences in gray matter volume in this region.

To further investigate this connection, researchers have conducted studies comparing brain structure and function in individuals who experience frequent lucid dreams with those who experience them less often. By controlling for variables such as dream recall frequency, these studies aim to determine whether differences in brain anatomy and connectivity are associated specifically with the frequency of lucid dreaming.

Some Quantum theorists have suggested that the phenomena observed in quantum physics, such as the non-locality of particles and the role of observation in determining outcomes, may have parallels with the subjective experience of consciousness and perception, including the phenomenon of lucid dreaming.

  1. David Bohm: Bohm was a theoretical physicist who proposed an interpretation of quantum mechanics known as the “Bohmian interpretation” or “pilot-wave theory.” He suggested that quantum particles are guided by an underlying order or “implicate order,” which may have implications for consciousness and the mind.
    1. Roger Penrose: Penrose is a mathematical physicist who, along with Stuart Hameroff, proposed the “orchestrated objective reduction” (Orch-OR) theory of consciousness. This theory posits that consciousness arises from quantum processes occurring within microtubules in neurons. While controversial, this theory suggests a connection between quantum physics and consciousness.
    2. Henry Stapp: Stapp is a theoretical physicist who has written extensively on the relationship between quantum mechanics and the mind. He has proposed that conscious experience involves the collapse of the quantum wave function and that mental processes may influence the outcome of quantum events.
    3. Evan Thompson: Thompson is a philosopher and cognitive scientist who has explored the relationship between consciousness and quantum physics from a philosophical perspective. In his book “Waking, Dreaming, Being: Self and Consciousness in Neuroscience, Meditation, and Philosophy,” he discusses the parallels between the experience of lucid dreaming and certain aspects of quantum mechanics.

These theorists have approached the topic from various perspectives, from physics and neuroscience to philosophy and psychology. While their ideas remain speculative and controversial, they have sparked interesting discussions and debates about the nature of consciousness and its potential connections to the fundamental principles of quantum physics. This is an important development in the merging of scientific and metaphysical thought and theory. By including lucid dreaming in the discussion we bridge the gap between the waking and. sleeping bardos and worlds.

Sweet Dreams,

QP

Buddhism, consciousness, how to meditate, LSD, Meditation, Metaphysics, mind, Philosophy, Psychology, Quantum Mechanics

Exploring the Mind: Enlightenment Through LSD or Meditation?

5 Comments

In a rare form of transpersonal experience, consciousness expands to include the Earth in its totality. People who have these experiences are deeply moved by the notion of our planet as a cosmic unity. ~Stan Grof[^1]

When we stop seeing ourselves as separate entities in the universe and we become more and more connected with culture, language, art, love, and people, we begin to notice all the other beings around us. Our pets, wild animals, even insects; simply all creatures big and small on land and sea. We look further and see that even the plant life and environment around us are so filled with life and vibrant beauty that we no longer see any division amongst the diversity of the species we share our earth with. And maybe, if we have just a little more openness, we see this earth as not just the source of life or the place we live but as life itself, a living Gaia if you will.

We struggle with the idea that there might be life on other planets in other solar systems and in other universes. How big of a jump is it to include a living universe that our earth is a small part of? Think of the sun without which most if not all life on Earth would cease. Can something that gives us life be life as well? How can you give what you do not have? If we include our sun then we include all other suns. If we include all suns then all planets in the infinite universe as well. All the energy in the universe is conscious, C=E=mc2.

If you think this sounds a lot like panpsychism, you are completely correct. Please read more about that here.

This transpersonal connection we all share is not unique, it’s not a one-off, not by a long shot. It’s all the energy we all have and share with the space around us. It points us towards the possibility that we are not our bodies, that we have more in common with each other and with all living things than is commonly thought and taught in the West.

The real beauty here is that when it comes to how we understand the conscious energy that we share with others and our environment, we begin to change the quality of our experience in beautiful and profound ways. It is hard to imagine how one could hurt another or damage something in anger when we are so intrinsically connected with all that is. It would simply hurt too much to hurt another and ourselves at the same time. Professor Grof gives us the solution to our problems old and new, whether it’s poverty, the polluted environment, or the wars that have plagued our earth for millennia. We simply cannot afford to be so destructive any longer as the danger of irreparable harm to our planet or complete annihilation grows.

To become a transpersonal initiate we have several options. As anyone who knows Professor Stan Grof and his studies and experience with LSD, it’s not surprising that he has this view, as he has in the quote above. He took Albert Hofmann’s experiment to a whole new level. “If I am the father of LSD, Stan is the godfather. Nobody has contributed as much as Stan for the development of my problem child.”[^2] Professor Grof is however not the only one who has posited such a transpersonal idea. The Buddha taught that all living beings have the Buddha nature and that even subject, object, and actions are one and the same. This view that we all share the same qualities and that even the physical and subjective worlds are one is mind altering. He then prescribed different forms of meditation to his followers and in doing so founded the world’s most peaceful and fun way of life.

So what is it about the LSD experience and a meditation practice that can change us so profoundly?

Professor Grof says, “If integrated wisely into society, psychedelics could play a crucial role in addressing some of our most pressing issues by promoting mental health, fostering creativity, and encouraging a deeper sense of ecological and social responsibility.”[^3] If you want to know more about his personal research on this matter, I highly recommend reading “Gateway to the Numinous” for a more comprehensive and detailed account. Actually, it’s mind-blowing. It seems that an LSD expiernce can connect us to the numinous that is within us all as it is outside as well. This powerful tool shows us that we are one with everything, I know it sounds a little 60’s and flower power but it really does have this effect most who have used it.

I, however, believe that meditation is far superior to the experiences that LSD can give. Primarily because we need to be productive and functional in everyday life all the time and meditation supports this on a daily basis and in every part of the world without breaking any laws. “Turn on, tune in, and drop out” as Timothy Leary suggests is not the way to a better world.

A good friend who had lots of experience with both meditation and LSD once told me, “LSD can show you the door to mind if you don’t know where it is. But only meditation and the dharma can take you through the door to a more meaningful and fulfilling life.” The effects of LSD can be temporary but meditation and the dharma is lasting. An altruistic lifestyle needn’t be obtained in a synthetic or artificial way; a natural way is always better. Meditation requires only a small amount of daily time and our awareness in and of our experiences. Working for others as a Bhodisattva is the real key here. They are many and I am one.

In the laboratory of meditation, we apply the science of mind to our inner experience. We begin to see how karma and impermanence affect our interpersonal experiences. We learn to see that we create our world with our thoughts, then our intentions, and finally our actions. The impressions or memories we have in our mind leave lasting connections between ourselves and everything we interact with. Because of this, we need to live more in touch with others and the environment around us. In short, if our life is full of weeds it’s because we planted them and we need to take responsibility for them before they overtake the garden. Let’s plant beautiful flowers and edible healing plants for all to enjoy instead.

The Buddha Dharma offers us a simple and holistic approach to everyone no matter our age or situation. Let’s not just be individuals going about our own lives, let’s be inclusive and compassionate with all life around us big and small, simple and complex. Let’s reacquaint ourselves with our inborn cosmic unity. Above all let’s bring meaningful behavior back into style.

QP

[^1]: Stanislav Grof, A Holotropic Mind.
[^2]: Stanislav Grof, Realms of the Human Unconscious: Observations from LSD Research.
[^3]: Stanislav Grof, Psychology of the Future: Lessons from Modern Consciousness Research.

Buddhism, consciousness, how to meditate, Meditation, Metaphysics, mind, Philosophy, Psychology

Descartes Fourth Embracing the Path of Enlightenment: A Buddhist Perspective on Certainty and Truth

Leave a comment

In our quest for truth and certainty, many philosophical traditions offer insights and guidance. While Descartes’ Fourth Meditation highlights the importance of God as the guarantor of truth, Buddhism takes a different approach, placing emphasis on the power of the mind and consciousness to unveil ultimate reality. Let’s explore this perspective through the lens of two key quotes from Descartes’ Fourth Meditation.

“For the more attentively I attend to God’s nature, the more evident it becomes that he cannot be a deceiver; and, accordingly, that everything which I clearly and distinctly perceive is of necessity true.”

While Descartes places trust in the existence of God as the foundation of truth, Buddhism directs attention inward, toward the nature of the mind and consciousness. In Buddhist philosophy, the mind is seen as the primary tool for uncovering truth and attaining enlightenment. Through practices such as mindfulness, meditation such as shine and laktong, and self-inquiry, individuals can cultivate clarity and insight into the nature of reality. Instead of relying on an external deity, Buddhists look within, recognizing the inherent wisdom and potential within their own consciousness.

“From this it follows that the certainty and truth of all knowledge depends uniquely on the knowledge of the true God, in so far as he is the sovereign and veracious author of all things.”

In contrast to Descartes’ reliance on God, Buddhism presents the concept of the Vajrayana truth state, which emphasizes clear or pure view and the full potential of enlightenment. In Vajrayana Buddhism, practitioners engage in transformative practices aimed at realizing the true nature of reality. Through methods such as visualization, mantra recitation, and energy channeling, individuals access deeper layers of consciousness and perception. This clear or pure view transcends conventional notions of truth, leading to a direct experience of mind and enlightenment—the ultimate state of awakening and liberation.

In conclusion, while Descartes’ Fourth Meditation offers insights into the quest for certainty and truth through the lens of God, Buddhism provides an alternative perspective centered on the power of the mind and consciousness. By embracing practices that cultivate clarity, insight, and realization of the Vajrayana truth state, individuals can journey toward enlightenment, unlocking their full potential and experiencing the profound depths of reality. Ultimately, the path of enlightenment beckons, inviting us to explore the boundless expanses of consciousness and truth within.

QP

Buddhism, consciousness, Meditation, Metaphysics, mind, Philosophy, Psychology

Jung vs Buddha Exploring Inner Wisdom

1 Comment

In the vast landscape of psychological, philosophical, and spiritual thought, the teachings of Carl Jung and the Buddha stand out as beacons of wisdom, offering profound insights into the human condition. While their backgrounds and contexts may differ, there are striking similarities in their messages, particularly when it comes to the exploration of the inner self and the pursuit of inner peace.

Carl Jung, a pioneering figure in psychology, emphasized the importance of delving into the depths of one’s own consciousness. Jung is quoted, “Your vision will become clear only when you look into your heart. Who looks outside, dreams, who looks inside, awakes,” encapsulates the idea that true clarity and understanding can only be found through introspection and meditation. By turning our attention inward, we awaken to the truths that lie beneath the surface of our everyday existence. Jung believed that by confronting our innermost thoughts, feelings, and fears, we can achieve a deeper sense of self-awareness and ultimately, a more meaningful life. I can certainly agree with him completely.

Jung surpassed Freuds work on ego and surmised that looking within would be the best path to inner strength and freedom.  Freud choose to look outwards for the cause of psychological problems, as Jung chose to engage man’s darkest shadow.

Similarly, the teachings of the Buddha resonate with the importance of inner exploration and self-discovery. The Buddha’s timeless wisdom, encapsulated in the quote “Peace comes from within. Do not seek it without,” emphasizes the inherent capacity for peace that resides within everyone. Albeit at different depths. Instead of seeking external sources of happiness or fulfillment, the Buddha’s teachings encourage us to turn inward and cultivate a sense of inner tranquility as we learn to touch our mind our innate or timeless source. True peace, according to the Buddha, is not dependent on external circumstances, but rather, it arises from a deep sense of acceptance and contentment with the present moment. This can only be achieved through meditation and complete awareness in every moment and situation we experience. Here one learns
to balance or surf on the waters of aversion and attraction.

Both Jung and Buddha recognize the transformative power of inner work. Jung’s insight that “Until you make the unconscious conscious, it will direct your life and you will call it fate,” mirrors the Buddha’s teachings on the importance of mindfulness and self-awareness. By shining a light on the unconscious aspects of our psyche, we gain greater control over our thoughts, emotions, and actions. Instead of being at the mercy of unconscious patterns and impulses, we become active participants in our own lives, capable of consciously steering our own destiny. We learn to create good Karma and cease the cycle of pain and suffering we know as samsara.

The simple essence of the teachings of Carl Jung and the Buddha converge on the fundamental truth that true wisdom and peace are found within. Whether through introspective analysis or mindfull meditation practice, both paths lead to a deeper understanding of the self and the world around us. By embracing the journey of inner exploration, we unlock the potential for profound transformation and lasting fulfillment in our lives. We become the owners of the cinema instead of just a patron, we identify with the light of the projector instead of the projector or the screen. Or more simply said we bring our shadow into the light.

QP

Buddhism, consciousness, Metaphysics, mind, Neuroscience, Philosophy, Psychology, Quantum Mechanics, Superposition

Quantum Woo or Enlightenment

Leave a comment

Isnt this all just Quantum Woo?

Quantum Woo is a thing, but is it so cut and dry as many pure traditional physisits would have you think? Many things in this world can be explained by an equation but perhaps not everything, is so simple?

Not everyone is adept enough to become a world class Quantum Physicist like Einstein, Heisenberg or Sheldon Cooper 😉 , however QM tries to explain the universe in which we all live in. Therefor to some extent we all have a say as it affects all of us. As we also know most branches of science are so specialized that no one has an overview that could be sufficient to cover all the bases, this is where Buddhism or the Science of mind can connect the dots that philosophers and psychologists are close to doing but physists either will not or are wooed away. I in no way think that every conspiracy theory can be explained or that we will all get rich if we follow some steps correctly at all, I simply think that there must be a middle way between the divide of the pure equations and the woo that seems to flood the internet theories that are better left alone due to their paranoia and victum psychology.

The mistake that science seems to make is that they are really good at explaining the objective world but have either forgotten or purposely left the mind or consciousness out of the equation. Logically speaking what good is an object like an atom or any object without a subject like you or me to use, have, or appreciate it in any way? The reverse is also true what good is a subject, a mind, without any thing such as an object to have or to use? One without the other is simply nonsense. This is the basis of the dualistic situation we find ourselves in.

E=mc2 Einstein’s famous equation can explain the subjective but what we really need is C=E=mc2, where C is consciousness and could be expressed as conscious energy. From his subjective position Einstein left himself out of the objective universe and I want to put us back in in a meaningful way. What’s the point of relativity if we leave all the relatives out? Afterall what was the surprising result of the famous double slit expirament? Why does it matter if a particle or wave is being observed or not? Very simply put our consciousness or awareness of a wave function causes the collapse of the wave front and the superposition of all the possibilities converge into one outcome before our very eyes.

Consciousness is fundamental nothing happens with out it, so to ask the age-old question, if a tree falls in the forest and nobody is there to hear is, does it make a sound?

C=E=mc2 is the sound it makes, because without the ears it’s just a vibration. Without an ear drum to receive the vibrations and translate them into sound, there can be no sound, only vibration expressing itself as a waveform of possibilities.

So one of my favorite sources of quantum woo is the famous physicist Erwin Schrödinger towards the end of his life he wrote several books. Had he written these books in the beginning of his career he likely wouldn’t have had one, he would have been written off as a quantum quack. Nevertheless he is still respected today so I’ll give the floor now to him.

“The reason why our sentient, percipient and thinking ego is met nowhere within our scientific world picture can easily be indicated in seven words: because it is itself that world picture.”

“Quantum mechanics is still in its infancy, but when it grows up it will enable us to understand phenomena in biology.”

These quotes highlight Schrödinger’s belief in the potential of quantum mechanics to shed light on biological phenomena or our existance as a whole, although they don’t specifically address consciousness they simply cannot be explained any other way.

QP

Ps. Now if the tree falls in our dreams does it really fall?

If a tree falls in a forest – Wikipedia

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dream_argument

For the other side of this story check this out https://iai.tv/articles/quantum-mysticism-is-a-mistake-philip-moriarty-auid-2437

Buddhism, consciousness, Meditation, Metaphysics, mind, Philosophy, Quantum Mechanics

Panpsychism C=E=mc2

9 Comments

Let’s explore the Relationship Between Consciousness and Energy in Comparison to Vajrayana Buddhism

Panpsychism is a philosophical theory that posits that consciousness is a fundamental aspect of the universe, present in all forms of matter from the smallest particles to complex organisms. This theory challenges traditional notions of consciousness as solely a product of biological processes, suggesting instead that consciousness is inherent in the very fabric of reality. Today, we will explore the relationship between consciousness and energy in the context of panpsychism, specifically comparing it to the perspective of Vajrayana Buddhism, which also has profound insights into the nature of consciousness and reality.

In the equation, C=E=mc², C represents consciousness as a fundamental aspect of the universe. Panpsychism asserts that consciousness is not exclusive to sentient beings but is pervasive throughout the cosmos, imbuing all matter with some level of subjective experience. C=E aligns with the notion that consciousness is a form of energy that permeates the universe, similar to the energy described by the equation and its relationship to mass. By framing consciousness as a fundamental force akin to energy, panpsychism challenges us to reevaluate our understanding of the relationship between mind and matter.

Vajrayana Buddhism, a school of Tibetan Buddhism known for its esoteric teachings and advanced meditation practices, offers profound insights into the nature of consciousness. According to Vajrayana teachings, consciousness is not limited to individual beings but is interconnected with all phenomena in the universe. This view resonates with panpsychism’s premise that consciousness is ubiquitous and present in all aspects of reality. In Vajrayana Buddhism, consciousness is seen as the radiant clarity that underlies all experiences and perceptions, transcending individual identity and ego. This is supported by the mind only, Cittamatra, or non dual perspective. Mind only means that everything that happens, what we see, what we do and the universe all happen in mind.

Both panpsychism and Vajrayana Buddhism share a holistic understanding of consciousness as a pervasive force that transcends individual beings. While panpsychism articulates this idea in terms of consciousness as a fundamental property of matter, Vajrayana Buddhism approaches it from a metaphysical perspective, emphasizing the interconnectedness of consciousness with all phenomena. Both perspectives challenge dualistic views of mind and matter, pointing towards a more integrated understanding of reality that acknowledges the intrinsic relationship between consciousness and the universe.

Furthermore, the equation C=E=mc² serves as a metaphorical bridge between panpsychism and Vajrayana Buddhism, highlighting the interconnectedness of consciousness and energy. Just as energy can be converted into mass and vice versa, consciousness in panpsychism and Vajrayana Buddhism can be seen as a dynamic process that transforms and manifests in various forms. Here we are reminded that subject, object, and action are all on; whereas consciousness, energy and mass form the universe. By exploring the parallels between panpsychism and Vajrayana Buddhism through the lens of consciousness and energy, we gain a deeper appreciation for the profound implications of these theories on our perception of reality.

The comparison between panpsychism and Vajrayana Buddhism offers a rich tapestry of ideas that challenge conventional notions of consciousness and its relationship to the universe. By viewing consciousness as a fundamental aspect of reality, both perspectives invite us to reconsider our understanding of mind, matter, and the interconnectedness of all phenomena. Through the equation C=E=mc², we are prompted to reflect on the deep unity between consciousness and energy, bridging the gap between scientific inquiry and spiritual wisdom. In exploring the parallels between panpsychism and Vajrayana Buddhism, we are called to contemplate the profound implications of these perspectives on our perception of self, reality, and the nature of existence.

QP

Buddhism, consciousness, Metaphysics, Philosophy

Who came first Heraclitus or the Buddha?

Leave a comment

Heraclitus was born in circa 500 BC in a city Called Ephesus, this is roughly the same time as the Historical Buddha Shakyamuni was born in Lumbini Nepal.

Both the Buddha and Heraclitus were influential figures in the history of philosophy, and while they emerged from very different cultural contexts and traditions, there are some interesting philosophical similarities between their teachings.

The Buddha’s concept of “Anicca” (impermanence) and Heraclitus’s famous quotes “Everything flows (Panta rhei) or nothing stands still” and “No man steps in the same river twice” reflect this shared perspective. I always love any comparison between mind and water. Here Heraclitus knows that by the virtue of the flow or flux of the water that impacts one small stone or grain of sand in the river, it has changed since the last time you stepped in it. In fact, one might say that we are this river and our constant state of experience changes our karma and energy that we continue moving forward with. 

Both philosophers focused on the importance of wisdom and self-realisation. The Buddha’s teachings centred on attaining enlightenment or nirvana through understanding the nature of suffering and the self. Similarly, Heraclitus believed that wisdom was achieved through understanding the underlying unity and harmony of the cosmos. Since we are a part of the cosmos and so is our mind, it is not difficult to see how this congruency is easily understood in a symmetrical and complimentary way.

The significance of the mind and its role in shaping perception and understanding is also an area of agreement. The Buddha’s teachings on mindfulness and meditation and Heraclitus’s belief in the logos (universal reason) point to this shared emphasis.

Non-Attachment was also emphasised by the Buddha and Heraclitus to achieve a state of inner peace and harmony. The Buddha taught about detachment from desires and cravings, while Heraclitus believed in finding unity with the universal flow by not clinging to specific outcomes. Heraclitus’ flow or flux theory is echoed in much of the Buddha Dharma.

In these ways both teachers reject materialism and suggest that an inward focus can lead to happiness and contentment in life. I find it wonderfully interesting how conscious mind and ideas can exist in more than one place at the same time. This really points to a co-emergence of awakening for people all over the world. Maybe these teachers and their ideas are not as separated as we might have thought. Are there more examples of this that are more recent or contemporary that you can think of? Drop a comment down below, I would love to hear from you.

QP

Buddhism, consciousness, Meditation, mind, Philosophy, Psychology

Meditating with René Descartes Part 2

1 Comment

Are we really who we think we are? What is the sum of all our thoughts? What is god? These are all wonderful questions that mankind has been asking since beginingless time. Both western and eastern philosophers have wrestled with them but in slightly different ways. I want to explore how close western philosophers like Descartes came to an understanding of Eastern Wisdom and the Buddha Dharma.

Descartes developed 6 meditations in which he doubts and removes all that he cannot prove to exist. He then gradually builds up a new existence that became a good part of how we in the west look at ourselves. In his second Meditation found in AT 24 he explores the question does god exist and what is my relationship to him? “Is there not a god, or whatever I may call him, who puts me into the thoughts I am now having? But why do I think this, since I myself may perhaps be the author of my thoughts”. Descartes is exploring the connection between his consciousness and that of god’s. From where do my thoughts arise, he asks?

In his previous work, Discourse on Method, we find his most famous quote “Cogito ergo sum” or “I think therefore I am” we can assume that Descartes from these two quotes confirms his existence or his ego as fact based on himself as being conscious or at least the source of his own and unique thoughts.

However the Lichtenberg Point put forward by Georg Lichtenberg takes Descartes’ thinking further by supposing that Descartes “I think” could really be interpreted as “It’s thinking” This puts some distance to the supposed source of thought, I like this argument but I would take it one step further and say “There is Thinking”. Why does this matter? Well, the Buddha Dharma shows us that subject, object, and action are really one. So the thinker, the thought that is thought, and the act of thinking are really inseparable, all are one.

Descartes later writes as further proof of his existence that he could be deceived by an external power. “But I have convinced myself that there is absolutely nothing in the world, no sky, no earth, no bodies. Does it now follow that I too do not exist? No: if I convinced myself of something then I certainly existed. But there is a deceiver of supreme power and cunning who is deliberately and constantly deceiving me. In that case I too undoubtedly exist, if he is deceiving me; and let him deceive me as much as he can, he will never bring it about that I am nothing so long as I think that I am something. So after considering everything very thoroughly, I must finally conclude that this proposition, I am, I exist is necessarily true whenever it is put forward by me or conceived by me.” So Descartes exists because he thinks and even if some doubt comes from outside that he does not exist, from a supreme power, he also must exist because he is being deceived.

Thinking? At least I have discovered it – thought; this alone is inseparable from me. I am I exist that is certain. But for how long? For as long as I am thinking. For it could be that were I totally to cease from thinking, I should totally cease to exist. At present, I am not admitting anything except what is necessarily true. I am, then in the strict sense only a thing that thinks; that is, I am a mind, or intelligence, or intellect, or reason – words whose meaning I have been ignorant of until now. But for all that I am a thing which is real and which truly exists. But what kind of a thing? As I have just said – a thinking thing.” What I find important here is the inseparability of thinking and the thinker. In essence, Descartes’ mind and thoughts are one.

This reminds me of the great Indian Mahasiddha Saraha, who said “if you think everything exists you are as stupid as a cow, and if you think everything does not exist you are even stupider”. This points once again to the inseparability of subject, object, and action.

In closing, I find Descartes’ of the inseparability of thinking and thinker to be quite close to the Buddha Dharma. However, the deception of ignorance that may be the supreme power used to deceive Descartes was that the thoughts themselves are separate from the thinker and the act of thinking.

QP

Buddhism, consciousness, how to meditate, Meditation, Metaphysics, mind, Philosophy, Psychology

Nothingness and Nihilism, Meditating with Descartes Part 1

Leave a comment

Descartes is undoubtedly one of the most influential philosophers of our time. He formed our concepts in the west about mind and our existence, although heavily influenced by the catholic church his ideas and theories are here to stay in one form or another. This discussion I intend to start is to discover what similarities can be found between Descartes’ western and christian theories and those of the Buddha Dharma one of the more influential wisdom traditions of the east. As I am here to learn I welcome as always welcome you to reach out and share your thoughts with the community here.

Descartes six meditations are truly a wonderful thought experiment in which he disassembles the foundation of all he believes to exist and then slowly builds them back up only as he in his mind can prove to himself their existence. I cannot understate how similar this process is to the Tibetan Guru Yoga that I practice almost daily. Where after focusing on the four basic thoughts and then taking refuge we dissolve the conditioned world and then slowly build it all back up again in a meaningful way.

Descartes rightfully understood that he held way too many ideas and concepts to doubt and move away from one at a time so he developed a way to deny the existence of large groups of concepts. This way instead of having to dismantle the wall one brick at a time he pulls away at the foundation and lets it all fall in on itself. He does this by doubting; if he can find a reason to believe that he might have been deceived or fooled in any way he removes everything he knows from his existence, even himself, his mind and god.

I think like most philosophers and physicists one must really come to a point where one seriously doubts or denies the existence of everything. We need to explore what the idea of nothing or nihilism might mean. Nihilism, the rejection of all religious and moral principles, in the belief that life is meaningless, but to an even greater degree that of existence as a whole. This is nothingness the absence or cessation of life or existence is at the centre of Descartes’ contemplation.

Over the years I have noticed in discussions with many people that a general conception about Buddhism is that we are nihilists. This misconception seems to be based on the idea that there is no right or wrong in Buddhism, only consequences or cause and effect. I would also add that when one mentions ego destruction it might seem like Buddhists want to kill themselves or something like this. The biggest misconceptions arise when we talk about emptiness, here almost every critic seem to think that Buddhists simply wish to end their existence in a pool of nothingness. These misconceptions could not be further from the truth the Buddha Dharma does not deny the existence of anything or anyone we simply say that things do not exist in the way in which it seems. The Buddha Dharma teaches us clearly that things truly exist but they do so in a way that is free of our concepts and ideas. This is the idea of emptiness, things are empty of the judgments we place on them when we decide or think that something is good or bad. Emptiness is not to be confused with nothingness. However, no thing, or no thingness, seems to be highly relevant in the discovery of our existence.

This is quite similar to the journey that Descartes begins here in his first meditation. Let’s meet soon for our next discussion in Rene Descartes’ second meditation.

QP

Buddhism, consciousness, Meditation, Metaphysics, mind, Philosophy, Psychology, Quantum Mechanics

Panpsychism, could it really be true?

80 Comments

Have you ever wondered how or where consciousness arises? I have and “Pan what?” was my first question when a good friend mentioned to me in conversation that what I was actually describing to him had already been theorised hundreds of years ago. “Phew, I am not the first idiot to think this” was my second thought and then “wait a second it would have been cool to come up with something new” was the third though. After the discussion, I read up on the subject I could not have been more amazed, as the inherent beauty and wisdom slowly sank deeply into my being.

panpsychism

Panpsychism postulates that consciousness is everywhere and in everything and that this non-local or cosmic-wide phenomenon is also without cause. In short, Consciousness is Fundamental in the universe. Even stones and elementary particles have consciousness, not just people, bugs, or plants. Even for me, this sounds a little far-fetched until you delve into the subject a bit more. The earliest known references to panpsychism are likely attributed to early religions like Shintoism, Taoism, Paganism, and Shamanism. Even Aristotle is quoted as saying “that everything is full of gods.” Plato argued in his Sophist that all things participate in the form of being and that it must have a psychic aspect of mind and soul. “This world is indeed a living being endowed with a soul and intelligence … a single visible living entity containing all other living entities, which by their nature are all related.” Wow, that is a big idea and not so easy for an individual to wrap his mind around it. That is probably the problem, the idea of panpsychism takes us from the comfort of our strongly held idea of an individual or ego and even the religious idea of a soul or atman to the understanding that not only are all beings one being but that all things are united in a blissful unity or beingness.

This is illustrated in Robert Fludd’s depiction of the world soul. I thought it might illustrate the idea of Panpsychism in an interesting way.

Fotothek_df_tg_0006450_Theosophie_^_Philosophie_^_Judentum_^_Kabbala_^_Kunst_^_Technik

Panpsychism has some competition it is not the only theory about the origin of mind, the emergence theory has many followers as well. Emergence Theory postulates that consciousness has emerged from some as yet unknown evolutionary chemical process. Philosopher Professor Galen Strawson articulates the relationship between panpsychism and emergence quite acutely: “The issue of emergence of mind is important because it is the mutually exclusive counterpart to Panpsychism: either you are a Panpsychist, or you are an Emergentist. Either mind was present in things from the very beginning, or it appeared (emerged) at some point in the history of evolution. If, however, emergence is inexplicable or is less viable, then one option  is left with the panpsychist alternative. This line of reasoning … is the (panpsychist) ‘argument from Non-Emergence.”

Interestingly there is no proof anywhere of consciousness or mind emerging from any process but neither is there any proof of panpsychism. Panpsychism is, however, in my opinion, far more elegant and takes mind or consciousness a few steps further than the emergence of mind as an evolutionary or purely materialistic process. Even with a rather superficial level of understanding of panpsychism, one might find some comfort in this theory that we are never alone and connected to everything in every way or coemergent with the universe. However, this may also strike fear into the hearts of those who are so deeply attached to their own individuality or egos. Regardless of one finds comfort or fear let’s discover some more of how Panpsychism, Quantum Physics, and Buddhism might be related.

When we analyse subatomic particles, one might say that there is no difference between the protons, neutrons, electrons, quarks, quarks, and leptons and bosons in my body, and the protons, quarks, and leptons in the desk in front of me except that I am conscious and the desk is not. Or is it but at a dramatically reduced level? David Bohm theoretical physicist and philosopher said, “That which we experience as mind … will, in a natural way, ultimately reach the level of the wave function and of the ‘dance’ of the particles.  There is no unbridgeable gap or barrier between any of these levels. … … in some sense, a rudimentary consciousness is present even at the level of particle physics” Just look at the observer effect with the double slit experiment. So here we can surmise that there is no barrier between me and the desk if even the electrons decide if they are a wave or a particle.

To this day we do not understand where or how consciousness arises and the role the brain plays in its formation if it plays a role at all. It could be just a receiver or radio, receiving information on several channels of perception that we would call our senses. Panpsychism skips this need to discover the relationship between the brain and the rise of conscious awareness completely, its simplicity is simply profound. No matter how shocking or strange panpsychism sounds I am reminded of what Sherlock Holmes said, that when you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth. Can science accept this deduction and if not how do we prove that which we have not been able to prove, other than keep trying even though the truth is already in front of us?

Buddhism teaches us that all beings have mind and or what we call Buddha nature, which is the ability to realize one’s full potential. Many teachers, when asked if plants have mind, would deny it and say that simply if it moves like an ant or something, then it has mind. As we know, plants only sort of move in their relationship to water and sunlight and the various degrees to which they require their nutrients. Some studies are even now suggesting that trees in the forest share nutrients and water with sick or old trees. This is not only consciousness but intelligence as well. This could be a very basic version of attraction and aversion, which is looking less and less attractive.  This rather narrow view is at the outset, not as encompassing as panpsychism. However, Buddhism requires us to break down any borders or boundaries between us and other things, this even applies to all concepts and ideas so why not to all phenomena as well. At an ultimate understanding of mind, where nothing has any true or independent existence in and of itself, all things would seem to have all the same qualities; conscious and otherwise. I would like to quote David Bohm once more here: “The notion of a separate organism is clearly an abstraction, as is also its boundary. Underlying all this is unbroken wholeness even though our civilization has developed in such a way as to strongly emphasize the separation into parts.” From the Undivided Universe: An Ontological Interpretation of Quantum Theory

This oneness without separation or boundary is exactly what we are talking about when Buddhists say that subject, object and action come together as one. This is known as the state of Mahamudra or complete and full awareness or consciousness. Once we have reduced this ontologically either in meditation, philosophically, or scientifically all that there is left points to just consciousness or mind and nothing else seems to matter, even matter itself. Imagine that, matter doesn’t matter. In this simple state of just being, connected with everything, and aware of all that there is, a state of great joy and bliss arises. Total freedom of mind, no more running from or reaching for, just complete happiness and wisdom resting in the suchness of everything. Here is where we can be really effective in this confused and angry world. Here is where we can really be the change that we wish to see in the world.

So is consciousness everywhere and in all things? I think so. Its simple beauty is both profound and inspiring, especially to the Buddhist ear. Modern science seems to agree more and more with this conclusion and I can only ask when or will modern society see the light as well? Perhaps Panpsychism is even the solution to the hard problem of consciousness. Which is to question how and why sentient organisms have qualia or phenomenal experiences.

This is one of my most successful posts ever and I am editing it today to include this wonderful video from a favourite Youtuber ASTRUM:

Scientists are baffled.     This is a link

Click the link or scroll down to the bottom.

For my German-speaking audience, I found two very interesting videos that discuss Panpsychism. The first one is from Professor Harald Lesch a wonderful physicist, astronomer, and philosopher who explores panpsychism from a purely astrophysical perspective with quite an open mind even though he does not agree with the idea.

The second video from Gerd Scobel actually a friend of Professor Lesch explores the topic from a philosophical perspective.

Personally, I think the Buddha Dharma has already answered this question, but that’s a topic for another post. This for me is just another way in which we see that consciousness is the vehicle in which the universe is becoming aware of itself. Why else would it be so beautiful and blissful to experience it either in meditation or by scientific discovery? Let us take this and use it as a tool to better the world and our fellow beings in every imaginable way. Whatever your view is on this topic I would love to hear from you, please feel free to comment below.

QP