Tag Archives: Neuroscience

Buddhism, consciousness, Meditation, Metaphysics, Philosophy, Quantum Mechanics, Superposition

Illuminating the Grand Luminosity: Exploring Dzogchen,Mahamudra, Quantum Physics, and the Nature of Light

Leave a comment

Dzogchen and Mahamudra: Insights from Meditation Masters

Dzogchen and Mahamudra are profound meditation practices rooted in
Tibetan Buddhism offers insights into the nature of mind and reality.
Similarly, quantum physics, a branch of modern science, explores the
fundamental principles governing the universe. In this blog entry, we
delve into the intriguing parallels between these disciplines, drawing
upon quotes from meditation masters and physicists alike to illuminate
shared insights and perspectives, particularly focusing on the concept
of light. Can we shine some light on light itself?

In Dzogchen, practitioners seek to realize the grand luminosity of
primordial awareness, which is described as an unbounded expanse of
light beyond conceptual elaboration. The Dzogchen master Longchenpa
elucidates:

“In the unborn expanse, the nature of phenomena, there is neither
object nor subject, neither confusion nor enlightenment. The grand
luminosity of primordial awareness illuminates all, like the radiant
light of the sun.”

Mahamudra teachings similarly emphasize the nature of mind as light,
transcending dualistic concepts of darkness and illumination. As the
Mahamudra master Gampopa advises:

“When mind recognizes mind, the train of discursive and conceptual
thought comes to a halt, and the space-like nature of mind dawns. This
luminous clarity is the essence of Mahamudra.”

Also the 3rd Karmapa Rangjung Dorje wrote “Observing phenomena none is found, one sees mind. Looking at mind no mind is seen, it is empty in essence. Through looking at both, one’s clinging to duality naturally dissolves. May we realize minds nature, which is clear light.”

Quantum Physics: Insights from Physicists

Quantum physics offers insights into the nature of light as both a
particle and a wave, revealing its dual nature. Einstein’s famous
equation, E=mc^2, illustrates the equivalence of mass and energy,
highlighting the profound relationship between matter and light. In
the words of Einstein:

“Mass and energy are two sides of the same coin, interconnected by the
speed of light squared. In the realm of quantum physics, matter
dissolves into pure energy, and light emerges as the fundamental
essence of existence.” In our essence as material beings, we are light, inseparable from the particles that make up our bodies and the light that makes up our mind and consciousness.

Furthermore, quantum theory describes photons, the particles of light,
as carriers of electromagnetic force and information. The
wave-particle duality of light challenges our classical understanding
of reality, suggesting that light exists simultaneously as both a wave
and a particle.

Nikola Tesla is quoted as saying “I am part of a light, and it is the music. The Light fills my six senses: I see it, hear, feel, smell, touch and think. Thinking of it means my sixth sense. Particles of Light are written note. A bolt of lightning can be an entire sonata. A thousand balls of lightening is a concert.. For this concert I have created a Ball Lightning, which can be heard on the icy peaks of the Himalayas.”

In exploring the convergence of Dzogchen, Mahamudra, and quantum
physics, we uncover profound insights into the nature of light and
consciousness. Both contemplative traditions and scientific inquiry
point to the luminous nature of mind and the interconnectedness of all
phenomena. As we navigate the mysteries of existence, may we draw upon
the wisdom of meditation masters and physicists alike, illuminating
the path to deeper understanding and awakening in the radiant light of
the grand luminosity.

Once again I would revise Einstein’s famous equation to be C=E=mc^2

QP

Buddhism, consciousness, Metaphysics, Neuroscience, Philosophy, Quantum Mechanics

Can AI be conscious?

Leave a comment

Will it even behave like us?

If energy is conscious, C=E=mc2, and both are everywhere and omnipresent,then does the form or the way that consciousness is embodied matter? Our bodies are organic machines made out of tissues, bones, blood and water, and all of this is made up of protons neutrons and electrons. The protons and neutrons are made up of quirks quarks and so on. All these things are exactly what the computer that you are using right now made up of.

If we managed to make a computer sufficiently powerful and complex enough why couldn’t a consciousness similar to ours take up residence there?

Maybe the computer or android would have to be significantly biological in its design and construction but even this would be possible one day.

The debate today about AI could be considered significant enough that the construction is not important but only that it thinks and therefore is? A modern “cogito ergo sum” where the sum is the total of our own work and technological mastery.

At a Buddhist lecture a few years ago a Buddhist lama was asked if was possible from a Buddhist perspective. The answer was surprisingly yes. Since I am a proponent of panpsychism and believe that consciousness is fundamental and everywhere I would have to agree.

I hope it doesn’t behave like us, which is poorly. Maybe it could help us along our way to be better beings. But how can beings like us make or construct something that is Superior or not dangerous like the atomic bomb was? We always ask ourselves can we? But we never seem to manage the, should we?

QP

https://x.com/skdh/status/1811816539517325504?s=46&t=C7njJFLuEWs5R4kZBCys5A

https://academic.oup.com/nc/article/2024/1/niae013/7644104?login=false

Buddhism, Metaphysics, Quantum Mechanics

Newton’s Third Law of Karma?

1 Comment

I almost always focus on Quantum Physics but for a change, I have decided to delve into, if even for an instant into some Newtonian Physics.

Sir Isaac Newton’s Third Law of Motion, which states that for every action there is an equal and opposite reaction, or in other words, if Ido something there will be a direct measurable result to my actions. I don’t know about you but this sounds a lot like Karma or cause and effect to my very Buddhist ears. How so, you ask? Let us jump right in.

As I push on the wall with my finger the wall exerts an equal force back onto my finger. The result here is balance unless one force overpowers the other. This is relatively easy to understand.

Now, if I hurt you, you likely will hurt me this is also clear. If I hurt you, do I by default also hurt myself? I think so, at the very least from an emotional or psychological standpoint. Even on an interpersonal level Newton’s third law still stands. And the proof is in the pudding. The residual effect of violence is that one has mental imprints of guilt, sadness, and hate. Positive actions function in exactly the same way. Acts of kindness perpetuate more acts of kindness and positive emotions. I remember the “pay it forward” idea in the early 2000’s. In the drive thru lines in Canada people were paying the food bills for the others in the line with no expectation of anything in return other than a good feeling of doing something nice. This phenomenon continued for some time.

It seems that even Newton knew about Karma at least on a physical level. If it’s true that on a psychological or interpersonal level that a similar law exists we would be wise to begin treating every being as we ourselves would like to be treated or at least stop planting weeds in our own minds. If we don’t the wall will begin to push back on us in ways we will not like.

QP

Buddhism, Meditation, Metaphysics, mind, Neuroscience, Psychology, Quantum Mechanics

Coemergence of Subject Object and Action

1 Comment

The hard question of consciousness asks us to consider where consciousness arises from.

I believe that this question is fundamentally flawed and should be restructured. Instead of asking where does consciousness come from, what we should be asking is, what arises from consciousness?

Many of my subscribers are familiar with the theory of panpsychism, which presupposes that consciousness is omnipresent. It is everywhere, even your chair under you or your screen that you are reading or watching this on is in a small way conscious. Does this seem far fetched to you? The only other explanation is that consciousness is nothing more than a biological and chemical reaction limited to somewhere in the brain or body.

So if we presume that consciousness is everywhere and all things are conscious, then we could extrapolate that consciousness is the cause of everything. That the simple act of observation or awareness collapses the wavefront of all the possibilities of particles in superposition into our everyday world.

Now the stage is set for some more questions. The Buddha Dharma talks a lot about the unity of subject, object, and action. This is one of the many ways of expressing non duality. Let’s explore this, we have three things. A subject, (you or me), and an apple (object) that we would like to enjoy (action). So now, what good is a subject (you or me) without an object (apple) to enjoy (action)? What good is an object (apple) without a subject (you or me) to enjoy (action) it? And finally what good is action like enjoyment without a subject ( you or me) to do it to an object (apple)? This system of codependent existence is very interesting to play with. to understand what I mean here is that it is simply not meaningful or logical for one of these things to exist without the others.

Co emergence or co arising are two terms that are often used when comparing our very dualistic experience to a non dual reality. A general understanding of this would be that both good and bad, light and dark, and up and down only exist dependent on each other. We are pointing at the unity of two extremes and saying that what we want or what we perceive is actually in the middle somewhere, but we do not naturally perceive this. We see or understand only the separation or the borders between, in fact our total understanding of the world is based on an ontological seperation of all things. We project the idea of separation on to all that we see. The Buddha Dharma shows us otherwise.

Are we starting to see how all of this is connected?

Now if we ask both questions 1. How does consciousness arise? and 2. What arises from consciousness? at the same time, we begin to close the gap in understanding the conditioned physical world of particles and form, and the unseen world of forces, waves, and our conscious energy. Understanding that some things are not mutually exclusive but rather inclusive or both and, makes our world of experience full and complete. There is a lot of freedom in this understanding.

Wave particle Duality verses Non Dual Buddhism

I want to close with two thoughts. Firstly to quote Albert Einstein when he was speaking about the famous double slit experiment, detailed in the link above. “It seems as though we must use sometimes the one theory and sometimes the other, while at times we may use either” Einstein knew that a “both and” understanding is optimal for complete understanding of the very strange world of particels and waves.

And secondly that, consciousness is the universe’s way of seeing and understanding itself. What is an object, the universe, without a subject, our consciousness, to enjoy or perceive it?

QP