Tag Archives: meta

Buddhism, consciousness, Meditation, Metaphysics, Philosophy, Quantum Mechanics, Superposition

Illuminating the Grand Luminosity: Exploring Dzogchen,Mahamudra, Quantum Physics, and the Nature of Light

Leave a comment

Dzogchen and Mahamudra: Insights from Meditation Masters

Dzogchen and Mahamudra are profound meditation practices rooted in
Tibetan Buddhism offers insights into the nature of mind and reality.
Similarly, quantum physics, a branch of modern science, explores the
fundamental principles governing the universe. In this blog entry, we
delve into the intriguing parallels between these disciplines, drawing
upon quotes from meditation masters and physicists alike to illuminate
shared insights and perspectives, particularly focusing on the concept
of light. Can we shine some light on light itself?

In Dzogchen, practitioners seek to realize the grand luminosity of
primordial awareness, which is described as an unbounded expanse of
light beyond conceptual elaboration. The Dzogchen master Longchenpa
elucidates:

“In the unborn expanse, the nature of phenomena, there is neither
object nor subject, neither confusion nor enlightenment. The grand
luminosity of primordial awareness illuminates all, like the radiant
light of the sun.”

Mahamudra teachings similarly emphasize the nature of mind as light,
transcending dualistic concepts of darkness and illumination. As the
Mahamudra master Gampopa advises:

“When mind recognizes mind, the train of discursive and conceptual
thought comes to a halt, and the space-like nature of mind dawns. This
luminous clarity is the essence of Mahamudra.”

Also the 3rd Karmapa Rangjung Dorje wrote “Observing phenomena none is found, one sees mind. Looking at mind no mind is seen, it is empty in essence. Through looking at both, one’s clinging to duality naturally dissolves. May we realize minds nature, which is clear light.”

Quantum Physics: Insights from Physicists

Quantum physics offers insights into the nature of light as both a
particle and a wave, revealing its dual nature. Einstein’s famous
equation, E=mc^2, illustrates the equivalence of mass and energy,
highlighting the profound relationship between matter and light. In
the words of Einstein:

“Mass and energy are two sides of the same coin, interconnected by the
speed of light squared. In the realm of quantum physics, matter
dissolves into pure energy, and light emerges as the fundamental
essence of existence.” In our essence as material beings, we are light, inseparable from the particles that make up our bodies and the light that makes up our mind and consciousness.

Furthermore, quantum theory describes photons, the particles of light,
as carriers of electromagnetic force and information. The
wave-particle duality of light challenges our classical understanding
of reality, suggesting that light exists simultaneously as both a wave
and a particle.

Nikola Tesla is quoted as saying “I am part of a light, and it is the music. The Light fills my six senses: I see it, hear, feel, smell, touch and think. Thinking of it means my sixth sense. Particles of Light are written note. A bolt of lightning can be an entire sonata. A thousand balls of lightening is a concert.. For this concert I have created a Ball Lightning, which can be heard on the icy peaks of the Himalayas.”

In exploring the convergence of Dzogchen, Mahamudra, and quantum
physics, we uncover profound insights into the nature of light and
consciousness. Both contemplative traditions and scientific inquiry
point to the luminous nature of mind and the interconnectedness of all
phenomena. As we navigate the mysteries of existence, may we draw upon
the wisdom of meditation masters and physicists alike, illuminating
the path to deeper understanding and awakening in the radiant light of
the grand luminosity.

Once again I would revise Einstein’s famous equation to be C=E=mc^2

QP

Buddhism, consciousness, Metaphysics, Neuroscience, Philosophy, Quantum Mechanics

Can AI be conscious?

Leave a comment

Will it even behave like us?

If energy is conscious, C=E=mc2, and both are everywhere and omnipresent,then does the form or the way that consciousness is embodied matter? Our bodies are organic machines made out of tissues, bones, blood and water, and all of this is made up of protons neutrons and electrons. The protons and neutrons are made up of quirks quarks and so on. All these things are exactly what the computer that you are using right now made up of.

If we managed to make a computer sufficiently powerful and complex enough why couldn’t a consciousness similar to ours take up residence there?

Maybe the computer or android would have to be significantly biological in its design and construction but even this would be possible one day.

The debate today about AI could be considered significant enough that the construction is not important but only that it thinks and therefore is? A modern “cogito ergo sum” where the sum is the total of our own work and technological mastery.

At a Buddhist lecture a few years ago a Buddhist lama was asked if was possible from a Buddhist perspective. The answer was surprisingly yes. Since I am a proponent of panpsychism and believe that consciousness is fundamental and everywhere I would have to agree.

I hope it doesn’t behave like us, which is poorly. Maybe it could help us along our way to be better beings. But how can beings like us make or construct something that is Superior or not dangerous like the atomic bomb was? We always ask ourselves can we? But we never seem to manage the, should we?

QP

https://x.com/skdh/status/1811816539517325504?s=46&t=C7njJFLuEWs5R4kZBCys5A

https://academic.oup.com/nc/article/2024/1/niae013/7644104?login=false

Buddhism, consciousness, Metaphysics, mind, Neuroscience, Philosophy, Psychology, Quantum Mechanics, Superposition

Quantum Woo or Enlightenment

Leave a comment

Isnt this all just Quantum Woo?

Quantum Woo is a thing, but is it so cut and dry as many pure traditional physisits would have you think? Many things in this world can be explained by an equation but perhaps not everything, is so simple?

Not everyone is adept enough to become a world class Quantum Physicist like Einstein, Heisenberg or Sheldon Cooper 😉 , however QM tries to explain the universe in which we all live in. Therefor to some extent we all have a say as it affects all of us. As we also know most branches of science are so specialized that no one has an overview that could be sufficient to cover all the bases, this is where Buddhism or the Science of mind can connect the dots that philosophers and psychologists are close to doing but physists either will not or are wooed away. I in no way think that every conspiracy theory can be explained or that we will all get rich if we follow some steps correctly at all, I simply think that there must be a middle way between the divide of the pure equations and the woo that seems to flood the internet theories that are better left alone due to their paranoia and victum psychology.

The mistake that science seems to make is that they are really good at explaining the objective world but have either forgotten or purposely left the mind or consciousness out of the equation. Logically speaking what good is an object like an atom or any object without a subject like you or me to use, have, or appreciate it in any way? The reverse is also true what good is a subject, a mind, without any thing such as an object to have or to use? One without the other is simply nonsense. This is the basis of the dualistic situation we find ourselves in.

E=mc2 Einstein’s famous equation can explain the subjective but what we really need is C=E=mc2, where C is consciousness and could be expressed as conscious energy. From his subjective position Einstein left himself out of the objective universe and I want to put us back in in a meaningful way. What’s the point of relativity if we leave all the relatives out? Afterall what was the surprising result of the famous double slit expirament? Why does it matter if a particle or wave is being observed or not? Very simply put our consciousness or awareness of a wave function causes the collapse of the wave front and the superposition of all the possibilities converge into one outcome before our very eyes.

Consciousness is fundamental nothing happens with out it, so to ask the age-old question, if a tree falls in the forest and nobody is there to hear is, does it make a sound?

C=E=mc2 is the sound it makes, because without the ears it’s just a vibration. Without an ear drum to receive the vibrations and translate them into sound, there can be no sound, only vibration expressing itself as a waveform of possibilities.

So one of my favorite sources of quantum woo is the famous physicist Erwin Schrödinger towards the end of his life he wrote several books. Had he written these books in the beginning of his career he likely wouldn’t have had one, he would have been written off as a quantum quack. Nevertheless he is still respected today so I’ll give the floor now to him.

“The reason why our sentient, percipient and thinking ego is met nowhere within our scientific world picture can easily be indicated in seven words: because it is itself that world picture.”

“Quantum mechanics is still in its infancy, but when it grows up it will enable us to understand phenomena in biology.”

These quotes highlight Schrödinger’s belief in the potential of quantum mechanics to shed light on biological phenomena or our existance as a whole, although they don’t specifically address consciousness they simply cannot be explained any other way.

QP

Ps. Now if the tree falls in our dreams does it really fall?

If a tree falls in a forest – Wikipedia

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dream_argument

For the other side of this story check this out https://iai.tv/articles/quantum-mysticism-is-a-mistake-philip-moriarty-auid-2437

Buddhism, consciousness, Meditation, mind, Philosophy, Psychology

Meditating with René Descartes Part 2

1 Comment

Are we really who we think we are? What is the sum of all our thoughts? What is god? These are all wonderful questions that mankind has been asking since beginingless time. Both western and eastern philosophers have wrestled with them but in slightly different ways. I want to explore how close western philosophers like Descartes came to an understanding of Eastern Wisdom and the Buddha Dharma.

Descartes developed 6 meditations in which he doubts and removes all that he cannot prove to exist. He then gradually builds up a new existence that became a good part of how we in the west look at ourselves. In his second Meditation found in AT 24 he explores the question does god exist and what is my relationship to him? “Is there not a god, or whatever I may call him, who puts me into the thoughts I am now having? But why do I think this, since I myself may perhaps be the author of my thoughts”. Descartes is exploring the connection between his consciousness and that of god’s. From where do my thoughts arise, he asks?

In his previous work, Discourse on Method, we find his most famous quote “Cogito ergo sum” or “I think therefore I am” we can assume that Descartes from these two quotes confirms his existence or his ego as fact based on himself as being conscious or at least the source of his own and unique thoughts.

However the Lichtenberg Point put forward by Georg Lichtenberg takes Descartes’ thinking further by supposing that Descartes “I think” could really be interpreted as “It’s thinking” This puts some distance to the supposed source of thought, I like this argument but I would take it one step further and say “There is Thinking”. Why does this matter? Well, the Buddha Dharma shows us that subject, object, and action are really one. So the thinker, the thought that is thought, and the act of thinking are really inseparable, all are one.

Descartes later writes as further proof of his existence that he could be deceived by an external power. “But I have convinced myself that there is absolutely nothing in the world, no sky, no earth, no bodies. Does it now follow that I too do not exist? No: if I convinced myself of something then I certainly existed. But there is a deceiver of supreme power and cunning who is deliberately and constantly deceiving me. In that case I too undoubtedly exist, if he is deceiving me; and let him deceive me as much as he can, he will never bring it about that I am nothing so long as I think that I am something. So after considering everything very thoroughly, I must finally conclude that this proposition, I am, I exist is necessarily true whenever it is put forward by me or conceived by me.” So Descartes exists because he thinks and even if some doubt comes from outside that he does not exist, from a supreme power, he also must exist because he is being deceived.

Thinking? At least I have discovered it – thought; this alone is inseparable from me. I am I exist that is certain. But for how long? For as long as I am thinking. For it could be that were I totally to cease from thinking, I should totally cease to exist. At present, I am not admitting anything except what is necessarily true. I am, then in the strict sense only a thing that thinks; that is, I am a mind, or intelligence, or intellect, or reason – words whose meaning I have been ignorant of until now. But for all that I am a thing which is real and which truly exists. But what kind of a thing? As I have just said – a thinking thing.” What I find important here is the inseparability of thinking and the thinker. In essence, Descartes’ mind and thoughts are one.

This reminds me of the great Indian Mahasiddha Saraha, who said “if you think everything exists you are as stupid as a cow, and if you think everything does not exist you are even stupider”. This points once again to the inseparability of subject, object, and action.

In closing, I find Descartes’ of the inseparability of thinking and thinker to be quite close to the Buddha Dharma. However, the deception of ignorance that may be the supreme power used to deceive Descartes was that the thoughts themselves are separate from the thinker and the act of thinking.

QP

Buddhism, consciousness, how to meditate, Meditation, Metaphysics, mind, Psychology

The Science of Being Nice.

Leave a comment

Well there you have it it’s finally been proven that it’s good to be kind to others. Not that we really doubted it 😉

“What studies have shown is that when we are either thinking about kind acts or witnessing kind acts or engaging in acts of kindness to other people, there are several biochemical changes that happen in our brain,” says Dr. Bhawani Ballamudi, SSM Health child psychiatrist. “One of the most important things that happens is that it releases oxytocin, a neurotransmitter that’s been studied extensively for its role in promoting a sense of bonding.”

Source: https://www.ssmhealth.com/blogs/ssm-health-matters/november-2022/the-science-behind-kindness

Oxytocin is associated with empathy, trust, sexual activity, and relationship-building. It is sometimes referred to as the “love hormone,” because levels of oxytocin increase during hugging and orgasm. And all I have to do is be kind to get this natural high, so how do I do that?

“Physiologically, kindness can positively change your brain. Being kind boosts serotonin and dopamine, which are neurotransmitters in the brain that give you feelings of satisfaction and well-being, and cause the pleasure/reward centers in your brain to light up. Endorphins, which are your body’s natural pain killer, also can be released.”

source: https://www.mayoclinichealthsystem.org/hometown-health/speaking-of-health/the-art-of-kindness. Steve Siegle is a licensed professional counselor in Psychiatry & Psychology

The Buddha dharma details in the Six Paramitas how we can generate joy and love in our lives as we practice to be be Bhodisattvas on the way to enlightenment. The practice centers around generosity, meaningful behavior, patience, joyful effort, meditation, and wisdom. Read more about it here on Quantum Awareness.